tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4057487038565855826.post6408247232724639595..comments2024-02-21T08:52:55.878+00:00Comments on Your Freedom and Ours: No, it was not a landslideHelenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13799545178433498944noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4057487038565855826.post-81096445681915437542009-07-23T02:48:03.000+01:002009-07-23T02:48:03.000+01:00If you factor in the acorn sponsored dead who vote...If you factor in the acorn sponsored dead who voted,and the spend(.6 billion against McCains pocket change) and the shameless racism reeling in afro americans and hispanics and the total ineptitude of the opposition (how did the party of Luther King loose the black vote to the KKK party?to do slightly better than GW Bush is OK at best.<br />Now we know why the dems were crying about the stolen election in 04, they thought they had bought/stole it and only (in their eyes) a bigger thief could have taken it.chris edwardsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4057487038565855826.post-85367466797269352712009-07-21T11:58:53.000+01:002009-07-21T11:58:53.000+01:00No, not only was it not a landslide but 0's ap...No, not only was it not a landslide but 0's approval figures look decidedly dodgy these days. According to Gallup 0's figures of 55% approval six months into his first term is the <a href="usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-07-20-obama-poll-economy_N.htm" rel="nofollow">third worst for any post-WW II president</a>. Care to guess who the two presidents were who had worse approval ratings? <br /><br />Hint: The answer can be found <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/presidential-approval-tracker.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a>.Mikgennoreply@blogger.com