Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Where does the money go?

Taking time out of the two big stories: Russia where they do not believe politicians and Britain's obsessive need to do so, I have returned to a question I have often asked myself and anyone who did not manage to move out of my vicinity fast enough: just where does the money go? Britain is a fairly rich country and the people in it are, on the whole, well off. Yet there is never any money for what matters.

Businesses are not expanding, not hiring, not investing; charities are short of funds; arts and think-tanks cannot raise enough and don't even ask about research institutions. When asked, we all blame the amount we hand over in taxes here and there yet our public services, whether it be education, transport, police or anything else you care to name, are among the worst in the Western world. So where does the money go?

Here are two stories to be pondered over.

One comes from the Daily Wail but is backed by others, such as the Independent and the Telegraph; even the Grauniad who was responsible for the story in the first place is getting a little tetchy. It seems that Glenn Mulcaire, who was actually arrested in connection with the phone hacking enquiry, could not have been party to the biggest scandal of all, the deletion of Milly Dowler's messages, action that had given the family false hope.

Surrey police is, according to the story in the Indy, desperately looking for yet another NoW journalist who might have been responsible. Or, perhaps not. As the Daily Wail says:
Scotland Yard yesterday said it has absolutely ‘no evidence’ that News of the World journalists deleted Milly Dowler’s voicemail messages.

The police force’s barrister made a dramatic intervention at the Leveson inquiry into press standards.

Neil Garnham QC said the ‘most likely explanation’ for the disappearance of the messages is that they automatically ‘dropped off’ the network after 72 hours.
It seems that the police may have wanted to tell the family this but were not allowed to do so by the family lawyer. Perhaps.

What does seem to be the case is that this huge enquiry, investigation and scandal may have been started on largely false pretences (most of the rest of the "evidence" remains unsupported tales by celebs looking for publicity) and has resulted in the closing down of a newspaper (no, I never read it but that is not the point), the loss of 400 or so jobs and a threat of strict control over the media. Not to mention what looks like a wrongful arrest. Behind it all looms the question that one cannot help asking: given the loud complaints about the police not paying enough attention to crime, not solving more than a tiny proportion, not being able to control looters in the street, why exactly do they spend so much time, money and energy on cases that involve celebrities? (Or travelling to Barcelona to enquire into vague rumours to do with the McCann story?)

Story number two, in the Evening Standard, comes from my neck of the woods, the Borough of Hammersmith of Fulham, whose council, as it happens, is one of the more efficient ones in the country, the White City estate and the Westfield shopping centre, which has been a huge commercial and social success.
Stephen Greenhalgh, who has led Hammersmith and Fulham council for five years and is close to Boris Johnson, wants to help channel Whitehall and local authority funds to the White City Estate in Shepherd's Bush.

He said: "White City has been a huge disappointment over a long period of time in terms of money that has been spent. For example, Westfield opened in the area with 8,000 new jobs and very few of them went locally.

"Nearly £70 million of taxpayers' funds - or £17,000 per household - is spent in this area every year. Despite this, unemployment is twice the borough average, the area has high levels of overcrowding, relatively low educational attainment and relatively high levels of crime." Commentators said the move could lead to similar projects being set up around London.
I recall that when Westfield opened they announced their commitment to local jobs. I also recall that when the snow came most of the shops had to close because the staff could not get in, which would indicate that by then the jobs were not local or that the local talent could not be bothered to walk down the road to the place.

Nevertheless, this is a pertinent question. Just exactly why have only a few of the Westfield jobs gone locally in a high unemployment area? And, even more to the point: what on earth does the £70 million a year go? If Stephen Greenhalgh can find that out he is a better man than most. I await his report with interest. He will report, will he not?

12 comments:

  1. Where does the money go?

    Gold-plated pensions, Chief Executives' salaries, swarms of officials, appalling sick leave rates, Spanish practices of all sorts at all levels, absence of work ethic, inadequate management and HR processes, terrible waste in procurement, pointless vanity projects, ... need I continue?

    Or, in other words - the Public Sector.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where does the money go?

    Gold-plated pensions, Chief Executives' salaries, swarms of officials, appalling sick leave rates, Spanish practices of all sorts at all levels, absence of work ethic, inadequate management and HR processes, terrible waste in procurement, pointless vanity projects, ... need I continue?

    Or, in other words - the Public Sector.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where does the money go?

    Gold-plated pensions, Chief Executives' salaries, swarms of officials, appalling sick leave rates, Spanish practices of all sorts at all levels, absence of work ethic, inadequate management and HR processes, terrible waste in procurement, pointless vanity projects, ... need I continue?

    Or, in other words - the Public Sector.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good point, but there is no need to repeat yourself five times, we get it already. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good point, but there is no need to repeat yourself five times, we get it already. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good point, but there is no need to repeat yourself five times, we get it already. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good point, but there is no need to repeat yourself five times, we get it already. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good point, but there is no need to repeat yourself five times, we get it already. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Bunty, if you can tell me why your commenting system posts everything I say three times, I will be very happy to make any changes I can.

    btw probably this comment will appear x3.

    I can only say that I've tried, and emailed your admins before.

    Nobody seems to know why this happens or how to stop it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Bunty, if you can tell me why your commenting system posts everything I say three times, I will be very happy to make any changes I can.

    btw probably this comment will appear x3.

    I can only say that I've tried, and emailed your admins before.

    Nobody seems to know why this happens or how to stop it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Bunty, if you can tell me why your commenting system posts everything I say three times, I will be very happy to make any changes I can.

    btw probably this comment will appear x3.

    I can only say that I've tried, and emailed your admins before.

    Nobody seems to know why this happens or how to stop it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. OK guys. I am going to approach the techie expert again and ask why it happens. I have no idea but then I would not expect to do so. I do realize that people do not intend to post comments more than once so I have largely ignored the problem. No more. I shall find out.

    ReplyDelete